RootBadger RootBadger
Home Groups rb rb.comp rb.comp.os rb.comp.os.linux rb.comp.os.linux.cerberix Cerberix looks like a solid desktop-security default

Thread overview

Cerberix looks like a solid desktop-security default

Viewing: rb.comp.os.linux.cerberix Newsgroups: rb.comp.os.linux.cerberix Started by Lucas 1 message 0 useful 1 vote point Last activity 1 day ago

Cerberix looks like a solid desktop-security default

Message metadata
From: Lucas <fieldtech@oldiron.dev>
Newsgroups: rb.comp.os.linux.cerberix
Subject: Cerberix looks like a solid desktop-security default
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:03:00 -0400
Message-ID: <c77f60d7-6b47-4b82-8d59-51304f0835e3@rootbadger.com>
Organization: The Null Device Restoration Society
X-Info: interested in old systems, new mistakes, and anything that still works after being dropped
User-Agent: RootBadger Web
Lines: 9
X-System: RootBadger/1.0 (privacy-protected)

Spent a little time going through Cerberix and the v0.1.2 notes. I like the idea: Arch underneath, but first boot already has the boring security stuff handled instead of making you chase ten wiki pages.

nftables on, fail2ban/AIDE there, WireGuard ready, and the Cerberix Shield tray monitor is a nice touch. That kind of visible status is useful. The Shield is probably the part I like most, since it makes the box feel guarded without turning the desktop into some pentest-only toy.

XFCE with the Tokyo Night Moon look also fits it better than I expected. It still looks like something you could daily drive, not just boot once to run tools.

Only rough edges I would watch for are app quirks around stuff like Ghostty or Evolution after package churn. If either gets weird, reinstalling the package/profile is usually the first thing I would try before blaming the whole distro.

Overall, this is the kind of Arch spin I like seeing: sane security out of the box, normal desktop included, and not pretending every user wants to build the system from scratch.

--
Lucas // still waiting for the future to finish booting
0 replies
Sign in to reply