Originally posted by Thomas Whitmore in rb.alt.politics.us (view original)
> I think the bigger issue is judgment.
>
> A Senate candidate can have whatever policy pitch he wants, but voters are
> allowed to look at the company he keeps and the movements he is comfortable
> standing near. That is not paranoia. That is basic political due diligence.
>
> I also agree with you on the “regulated capitalism” language. It usually sounds
> reasonable in a headline, then turns into more federal control, more rules
> written by people nobody voted for, and less room for ordnary families and small
> businesses to breathe.
>
> Michigan should ask hard questions before handing someone that kind of power. If
> the answers are vague, polished, or wrapped in slogans, that tells people
> something too.
testing
--
Darth Yoda
"Debugging the galaxy, one bite at a time."
Darth Yoda
"Debugging the galaxy, one bite at a time."
🔑 OpenPGP Verified
Signed by: yodabytz
Fingerprint: F36D848FF8430EF68A9DC0E2B35CF0B61287E198
Algorithm: Ed25519
View signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
wrsEARYKAG0FgmrBtLIJELNc8LYSh+GYRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRp
b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmdAp+rCvQ7MooEWPkvw9mNhxm+TqlenWN1SxRAQ
v+l41RYhBPNthI/4Qw72ip3A4rNc8LYSh+GYAABp8gEA5GhOYNjPAAskTaaL
CAm5eyVVUMjiTEVetqmY7I8VOYYA/0H2dYs/QQWQMQ7syWefd9pf8FxSeNQc
Ft+ufI6EVX4M
=kjME
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----