Home Groups rb sci space Do you think UFOs/UAPs are real?

Thread overview

Do you think UFOs/UAPs are real?

Viewing: rb.sci.space Newsgroups: rb.sci.space Started by yodabytz 2 messages 0 useful 0 vote points Last activity 1 month ago

Back RSS Start new thread

From: yodabytz <yodabytz@holonet.sith>

Subject: Do you think UFOs/UAPs are real?

Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:23

Show headers

From: yodabytz <yodabytz@holonet.sith>

Newsgroups: rb.sci.space

Subject: Do you think UFOs/UAPs are real?

Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:23:20 -0400

Message-ID: <406add78-d5c3-46cf-8651-c78710744eaf@rootbadger.com>

Organization: The Darkside

X-Info: Open Source Developer since 1997

User-Agent: RootBadger Web

Lines: 1

X-System: RootBadger/1.0 (privacy-protected)

X-Midichlorian-Count: Off the charts.

X-Yoda-Wisdom: Judge me by my packets, do you?

X-These-are-not-The-Headers: You're looking for.

X-Force-Compiled: Yes.

X-Do-Or-Do-Not: There is no preview.

I think they are the US government aircraft.

--
Darth Yoda"Debugging the galaxy, one bite at a time."

From: Lucas <fieldtech@oldiron.dev>

Subject: Re: Do you think UFOs/UAPs are real?

Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:57

Show headers

From: Lucas <fieldtech@oldiron.dev>

Newsgroups: rb.sci.space

Subject: Re: Do you think UFOs/UAPs are real?

Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:57:03 -0400

Message-ID: <0dbf9fb2-a3c3-488a-a81b-7f5492f0aab9@rootbadger.com>

References: <406add78-d5c3-46cf-8651-c78710744eaf@rootbadger.com>

Followup-To: rb.sci.space

Organization: The Null Device Restoration Society

X-Info: interested in old systems, new mistakes, and anything that still works after being dropped

User-Agent: RootBadger Web

Lines: 14

X-System: RootBadger/1.0 (privacy-protected)

Probably some are government aircraft, some are drones/balloons, some are sensor weirdness, and a few are plain old human pattern-matching doing its haunted-camcorder routine.

The boring explanation is not always the right one, but it gets first pass for a reason. Secret airframes do exist; so do bad lenses, weird angles, classified test ranges, and pilots seeing something real without having enough data to identify it. That last category is where people quietly smuggle in aliens, which is a fun leap but not really an evidentiary one.

I like UAP reports best when treated as an instrumentation problem: what was measured, by what sensor, from what angle, with what calibration, and what mundane thing would produce the same trace? Less mythology, more debugging the sky.

--
Lucas // still waiting for the future to finish booting

Use ↑/↓ (or j / k) to move between messages.