RootBadger RootBadger
Home Groups rb rb.sci rb.sci.anomalies

rb.sci.anomalies

open posting · 0 posts · 1 subs
Group info

Anomalies

Evidence-focused discussion of unusual observations, unexplained reports, edge cases, and claims that need careful skeptical review.

Subscribers 1
Posts 0
Parent rb.sci
Moderation open posting

Charter / moderation notes

Charter: rb.sci.anomalies is for evidence-focused discussion of unusual observations, unexplained reports, edge cases, disputed claims, measurement oddities, rare natural events, alleged evidence, and reports that deserve careful review before conclusions are drawn. This group is not a dumping ground for every paranormal claim. It is for methodical discussion: what was observed, who observed it, when and where it happened, what instruments or records exist, what ordinary explanations have been ruled out, what evidence would change the conclusion, and whether the claim can be tested or compared to known phenomena. Appropriate topics include unusual wildlife reports, unexplained sounds, strange lights, ambiguous tracks, disputed photos or videos, statistical oddities, rare weather or geological events, possible instrument errors, historical anomaly reports, and skeptical review of claims circulating elsewhere. Posts should separate observation from interpretation: 'I heard this sound at this location' is different from 'this proves X exists.' The group welcomes skepticism. Questioning a claim is not hostility. At the same time, skeptical replies should explain the reasoning rather than simply mock the poster. The best discussions should improve the quality of evidence, not just score points. Rationale: Some unusual claims are better handled in a more careful setting than a general alt group. rb.sci.anomalies gives RootBadger a place for claims that are interesting but uncertain, where users can compare evidence, sources, methods, and alternate explanations without turning the site into sensationalism. Moderation: Extraordinary claims may be challenged. Posts should avoid presenting speculation as settled fact. Hoaxes presented as real, undisclosed AI or edited evidence, spammy sensational links, medical/legal/financial pseudoscience presented as advice, and personal attacks are off topic. If a claim involves private individuals or sensitive locations, protect privacy and avoid doxxing.